$38 Trillion a Year to Fix Climate Change, the Fix That Costs the Same As War

And if global temperatures keep rising as they do, it will cost the same as a permanent ongoing war. 

Climate Change Costs Money 

Image Credit: Pexel / Tima Miroshnichenko

It’s no secret that climate change causes damage to our planet, which costs money to fix / prevent. But when comparing studies done only a few months apart, those costs seem to skyrocket.

A Hefty Bill 

Image Credit: Pexel / picjumbo.com

For example, a Sep 2023 study published in the journal Nature Communications found that, by 2050, the worldwide cost to fix the damage will be between $1.7 trillion and $3.1 trillion.

And that’s per year. 

The Costs Are Rising 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

A more recent study, conducted in April this year by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and supported by the German government, concluded that fixing global warming by 2050 could cost a whopping $38 trillion a year.

We’re Making It Worse 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / N.Minton

That figure considers the costs of fixing the destruction of farming, infrastructure, productivity, and health by climate change. However, it’s sure to increase the more greenhouse gases we continue to emit.  

In addition, the study also estimates that global warming will reduce the world’s GDP by 17% by 2050. 

Where’s the Money? 

Image Credit: Pexel / Karolina Kaboompics

It was also found that not only are governments spending too little to control climate change, but also to adapt to its worldwide impact. 

Higher Poverty Levels 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / G-Stock Studio

Should greenhouse gases persist at the current levels and the global average temperature exceeds 4°C, the projected economic impact post-2050 would mean a 60% reduction in income by 2100. 

However, if we manage to keep that temperature rise to 2°C, the anticipated losses will decrease to about 20%. 

Actually, It’s Worse… 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Stokkete

Another recent paper, ‘The Macroeconomic Impact of Climate Change: Global vs. Local Temperature’ by Harvard economist Adrien Bilal & Northwestern University economist Diego R. Känzig, released in May this year, found that the macroeconomic damages caused by global warming are six times more than originally calculated. 

Miscalculations or Wishful Thinking? 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Tada Images

According to this research, the social costs of carbon (meaning the damage inflicted on each extra ton of carbon emissions) works out to around $1,056 per ton – a much higher figure than $190 per ton, which is the one previously calculated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

What About Rising Temperatures? 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Serhiy Stakhnyk

The study also concluded that a mere 1°C rise in global temperature equals a 12% reduction of the world’s GDP. 

It’s Getting Hot(ter) in Here 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Alexandros Michailidis

And since our world has already heated up by more than 1°C since pre-industrial times, many climate scientists agree that an increase of 3°C thanks to fossil fuels before the next century is unavoidable. 

The Costs of War 

Image Credit: Pexel / David Peinado

However, according to the findings, a 3°C increase will be “comparable to the economic damage caused by fighting a war domestically and permanently.” 

Climate Change = Poorer People? 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / SergeBertasiusPhotography

As Bilal states in the study: “There will still be some economic growth happening but by the end of the century people may well be 50% poorer than they would’ve been if it wasn’t for climate change.”  

Our Own Fault 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / wellphoto

This is backed by the PIK study, as its co-author and climate data researcher Leonie Wenz claims: “The world population is poorer than it would be without climate change. It costs us much less to protect the climate than not to.”

Could Have Been Better 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / aerogondo2

Additionally, Bilal also says if global warming hadn’t existed for the past 50 years, the world’s purchasing power (which measures how much people are able to buy) would be 37% higher than it currently is. 

And the UN? 

Image Credit: Pexel / Xabi Oregi

Just prior to last November’s COP28 summit in Dubai, UN agencies published various updates on the global efforts to curb climate change. The results were interesting…  

Greenhouse Gases on the Rise 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Evgenii Panov

For example, according to the UN Emissions Gap Report, the world’s greenhouse gases from 2021 to 2022 increased by 1.2%, equaling 57.4 gigatons of carbon dioxide for one year. 

Way Behind 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Postmodern Studio

Also, the emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030 are predicted to decrease by only 2% compared to 2019 levels – much lower than the 43% estimation deemed essential by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change needed to limit the planet’s rising temperature of 1.5°C. 

Wealthy Countries Don’t Share 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Africa Studio

According to the Adaptation Gap Report, about $387 billion was needed annually for adaptation initiatives to slow down climate change in 2021. But only $21 billion was available, equaling a shortfall of about $366 billion. 

Worsening Weather 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Bilanol

Finally, we come to the fact that extreme weather events have been increasing globally, with damages caused by floods, heat waves, and hurricanes costing about $2.8 trillion, as per the Nature Communications study. 

Now What? 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / IrynaL

A methodology known as Extreme Event Attribution (EEA) was used by the researchers, which links human-related greenhouse gas emissions to extreme weather alterations. 

Based on this, the study authors concluded that to rectify the damage caused by extreme weather only from 2000 to 2019 works out to approximately $143 billion – equaling about $16.3 million every hour! 

The point of all this? We, meaning the world, literally can’t afford the problem that we have ourselves created and are continuing to worsen by the day. 

DeSantis in More Hot Water as Florida Floods, Again

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Andrew Cline

Florida residents are struggling this hurricane season, and many are pointing the finger at a certain Governor. DeSantis in More Hot Water as Florida Floods, Again

J.C. Penney’s Closures Signal the End of an Era in Retail

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Jonathan Weiss

Popular department store, J.C. Penney, has announced the closure of multiple stores across the country. This announcement reflects changes in the retail industry as online shopping becomes more popular. But how will these changes affect consumers and the future of in-store shopping? J.C. Penney’s Closures Signal the End of an Era in Retail

Michigan’s Governor Whitmer Lays Down the Law for HOAs

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gints Ivuskans

Gretchen Whitmer has just taken on HOAs across Michigan. Who won? Michigan’s Governor Whitmer Lays Down the Law for HOAs

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / thmphotographs.

The images used are for illustrative purposes only and may not represent the actual people or places mentioned in the article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *